<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trinity Mirror stops selling followed links &#8211; Christian Science Monitor starts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/christian-science-monitor-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/christian-science-monitor-links/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaamit</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/christian-science-monitor-links/#comment-3543</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 07:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=2009#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>Yeah sorry bout that, looks like both my PageRank toolbars were playing up yesterday, it is PR5 so false alarm on that one.

Perhaps it was wishful thinking, I don&#039;t expect Google to pick up on this crap anytime soon to be honest!

And yes. That relocation section is a crazy giant paid link article farm. Definitely putting the &quot;fun&quot; back into Christian Fundamentalism.  And it seems like Relocation.com have paid big money for this, they get links from every article it seems, plus a promient link from the homepage header of csmonitor.com!  Actually I wonder if all the sites linked to are owned by relocation.com...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah sorry bout that, looks like both my PageRank toolbars were playing up yesterday, it is PR5 so false alarm on that one.</p>
<p>Perhaps it was wishful thinking, I don't expect Google to pick up on this crap anytime soon to be honest!</p>
<p>And yes. That relocation section is a crazy giant paid link article farm. Definitely putting the "fun" back into Christian Fundamentalism.  And it seems like Relocation.com have paid big money for this, they get links from every article it seems, plus a promient link from the homepage header of csmonitor.com!  Actually I wonder if all the sites linked to are owned by relocation.com...?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/christian-science-monitor-links/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=2009#comment-3538</guid>
		<description>Odd. I see it as PR5? Anyway, they don&#039;t rank very high for Christian Science (5 or so) so maybe it is affecting them? 

Have you had a look round the relocation section? The articles with the relocation icon on the index page are stuffed full of keyword links. It looks like SEO gone mad ...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd. I see it as PR5? Anyway, they don't rank very high for Christian Science (5 or so) so maybe it is affecting them? </p>
<p>Have you had a look round the relocation section? The articles with the relocation icon on the index page are stuffed full of keyword links. It looks like SEO gone mad ...!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaamit</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/christian-science-monitor-links/#comment-3537</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=2009#comment-3537</guid>
		<description>Interesting that csmonitor.com has been given a PR0, indicating that Google has devalued their paid links anyway? They don&#039;t seem to have been penalised in the SERPS though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that csmonitor.com has been given a PR0, indicating that Google has devalued their paid links anyway? They don't seem to have been penalised in the SERPS though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

