<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Daily Express and OK hit with PageRank penalty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9626</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9626</guid>
		<description>Nice to know that Google rates my own blog (let alone Lib Dem Voice) more highly, but really says far more about how badly the Express has got it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to know that Google rates my own blog (let alone Lib Dem Voice) more highly, but really says far more about how badly the Express has got it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9625</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9625</guid>
		<description>Funny, the &quot;reputable&quot; SEO company that was trying to sell me links on The Express&#039; website only just got back in touch with me last week. I wonder how many other newspaper websites they have their grubby mitts on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the "reputable" SEO company that was trying to sell me links on The Express' website only just got back in touch with me last week. I wonder how many other newspaper websites they have their grubby mitts on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google flexes page rank muscles, hits Daily Express? &#171; Tim Anderson&#8217;s ITWriting</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9601</link>
		<dc:creator>Google flexes page rank muscles, hits Daily Express? &#171; Tim Anderson&#8217;s ITWriting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9601</guid>
		<description>[...] then saw a report saying that Google has indeed penalised the Daily Express. I checked the page rank of the Daily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then saw a report saying that Google has indeed penalised the Daily Express. I checked the page rank of the Daily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stu Bowker</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9600</link>
		<dc:creator>Stu Bowker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9600</guid>
		<description>Good spot Ian Miller!

I&#039;ve just done a few checks and the OK site also 302&#039;s, well actually  www.ok.co.uk 301s to ok.co.uk which 302&#039;s to /home.

If this has been put in place over the last few months then OK has now lost the benefit of around 215,000 external links and Express, 261,000 according to Open Site Explorer and could therefore possibly explain the gradual decrease in PR.

Of course this is only speculation but it could just be a coincidence or both have actually happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good spot Ian Miller!</p>
<p>I've just done a few checks and the OK site also 302's, well actually  <a href="http://www.ok.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ok.co.uk</a> 301s to ok.co.uk which 302's to /home.</p>
<p>If this has been put in place over the last few months then OK has now lost the benefit of around 215,000 external links and Express, 261,000 according to Open Site Explorer and could therefore possibly explain the gradual decrease in PR.</p>
<p>Of course this is only speculation but it could just be a coincidence or both have actually happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>David Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re all jumping up and down about green fairy dust?

Who cares? They&#039;re still in google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're all jumping up and down about green fairy dust?</p>
<p>Who cares? They're still in google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9598</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9598</guid>
		<description>The website (http://ok.co.uk/home/) has a Google PR ranking of 2 currently.

Gary - what URL are you looking at?

cheers,
Andy

www.Linkstream.co.uk - SEO Web App</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The website (<a href="http://ok.co.uk/home/" rel="nofollow">http://ok.co.uk/home/</a>) has a Google PR ranking of 2 currently.</p>
<p>Gary - what URL are you looking at?</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
Andy</p>
<p><a href="http://www.Linkstream.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.Linkstream.co.uk</a> - SEO Web App</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9597</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9597</guid>
		<description>I see the site as having a PR 4 at the moment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the site as having a PR 4 at the moment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9596</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9596</guid>
		<description>Interesting update Malcolm - thanks.

It appears Express Group are getting increasingly desperate to generate revenue no matter how ethical or short term. Long-term the newspaper industry as a whole (in printed form) is unsustainable under their current business model. 

Google understand this - it&#039;s taken a while (the writing has been on the wall for many years) but i think this is a desperate tactic from a sinking ship. Bad for jobs but good for trees ;-)

I&#039;m looking forward to reading free news (without any Murdoch bias) on my iPad very soon ;-)

best,
Andy
www.Linkstream.co.uk - SEO Web App</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting update Malcolm - thanks.</p>
<p>It appears Express Group are getting increasingly desperate to generate revenue no matter how ethical or short term. Long-term the newspaper industry as a whole (in printed form) is unsustainable under their current business model. </p>
<p>Google understand this - it's taken a while (the writing has been on the wall for many years) but i think this is a desperate tactic from a sinking ship. Bad for jobs but good for trees <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I'm looking forward to reading free news (without any Murdoch bias) on my iPad very soon <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>best,<br />
Andy<br />
<a href="http://www.Linkstream.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.Linkstream.co.uk</a> - SEO Web App</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9595</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>Andrew - good spot re OK. I&#039;ve found some interesting data showing how it went from 5 to 3 over the last few months - and down to 2 in only the last month. See updated post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew - good spot re OK. I've found some interesting data showing how it went from 5 to 3 over the last few months - and down to 2 in only the last month. See updated post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hudghton</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/express-pagerank-penalty/#comment-9593</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hudghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 09:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4305#comment-9593</guid>
		<description>Good spot; I assumed Google would do diddly squat (at least in the short term). This is one of those times I&#039;d be glad to be wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good spot; I assumed Google would do diddly squat (at least in the short term). This is one of those times I'd be glad to be wrong!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
