<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google puts the anal in analytics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quadri</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/#comment-13212</link>
		<dc:creator>Quadri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4826#comment-13212</guid>
		<description>I write from Italy.
I use usually google.it.
But i do not notice the presence of google instant...
Ho can I check exactly if i have this new functionality nor not ?

Thanks in advance

Irene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I write from Italy.<br />
I use usually google.it.<br />
But i do not notice the presence of google instant...<br />
Ho can I check exactly if i have this new functionality nor not ?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
<p>Irene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynden</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/#comment-12848</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4826#comment-12848</guid>
		<description>Neither is &quot;fadge&quot; :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neither is "fadge" <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hughes</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/#comment-12829</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4826#comment-12829</guid>
		<description>Probably won&#039;t publish this, just thought I&#039;d let you know &quot;clunge&quot; isn&#039;t filtered out :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably won't publish this, just thought I'd let you know "clunge" isn't filtered out <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/#comment-12801</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 09:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4826#comment-12801</guid>
		<description>I agree.  What if people want to see anal or cock results.  All sounds too censored to me.  Porn is one of the biggest industries on the net!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  What if people want to see anal or cock results.  All sounds too censored to me.  Porn is one of the biggest industries on the net!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Tudor</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/google-puts-the-anal-in-analytics/#comment-12462</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Tudor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4826#comment-12462</guid>
		<description>An interesting observation!  Potentially a little concerning though.  Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but this is the first time I&#039;ve seen Google actually manipulate the search results displayed and take freedom away from searchers, regardless of their personal settings.

Users have no control over whether these adult searches are shown, as even with safe search off Google still filter the results shown at their end, result in almost &#039;false&#039; search results pages.

Makes you wonder what other searches they may be filtering prior to displaying results.  A shape of things to come perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting observation!  Potentially a little concerning though.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the first time I've seen Google actually manipulate the search results displayed and take freedom away from searchers, regardless of their personal settings.</p>
<p>Users have no control over whether these adult searches are shown, as even with safe search off Google still filter the results shown at their end, result in almost 'false' search results pages.</p>
<p>Makes you wonder what other searches they may be filtering prior to displaying results.  A shape of things to come perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
