<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How much prominence should online corrections and clarifications get?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/how-much-prominence-should-online-corrections-and-clarifications-get/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/how-much-prominence-should-online-corrections-and-clarifications-get/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/how-much-prominence-should-online-corrections-and-clarifications-get/#comment-7905</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3998#comment-7905</guid>
		<description>I had a look for it online but I couldn&#039;t find it either...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a look for it online but I couldn't find it either...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JTownend</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/how-much-prominence-should-online-corrections-and-clarifications-get/#comment-7903</link>
		<dc:creator>JTownend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3998#comment-7903</guid>
		<description>Media Standards Trust had an interesting idea in its submission to PCC review: that corrections should be scaled in size depending on seriousness, with financial implications for advertising space. Not sure if it would fly, but implies corrections would have more prominence: http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/537348.php  

Any idea if the article in question here appeared online? I can&#039;t find it straight off. I wanted to see how it had been corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media Standards Trust had an interesting idea in its submission to PCC review: that corrections should be scaled in size depending on seriousness, with financial implications for advertising space. Not sure if it would fly, but implies corrections would have more prominence: <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/537348.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/537348.php</a>  </p>
<p>Any idea if the article in question here appeared online? I can't find it straight off. I wanted to see how it had been corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
