Google’s indexed 64 fake Independent jelly-bean Kate-Middleton URLs
Someone spotted today that you can change the Independent's URLs to anything as long as you leave in the unique identifier number. (See updates at the bottom for how multiple URLs for this story are now in Google's index via the power of Twitter.)
So this story (about a jelly bean with Kate Middleton's face in) can also be reached here with a URL of http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/utter-PR-fiction-but-people-love-this-shit-so-fuck-it-lets-just-print-it-2269573.html (Update - this rude version has had 1,476 retweets compared with 33 for the original version!)
People are busy changing this to anything they like on Twitter. Google has already indexed the two versions:

Sweary URLs ...
How many more?!?
Update: While writing this post, a third one had been indexed at http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/you-can-say-anything-you-like-in-this-bit-including-read-the-guardian-instead-of-the-indie-2269573.html.
More to come I'm sure ... You can test for yourself how many Google has indexed by running this search (Google is at least recognising them as duplicate URLs).
Update 2: Google has the sweary version on page one of its results when you search for kate middleton jelly bean. (And the sweary version is first for a search on Kate Middleton bean)
Update 3: There are now 12 URLs indexed for this story, including the following:
- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/benjamin-gray-is-the-true-heir-to-the-throne-2269573.html
- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/OMFG-i-can-write-ANYTHING-I-WANT-in-here-and-create-FAKE-TWITTER-MEMES-2269573.html
- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/Load-of-old-wank-2269573.html
- http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/unfortunately-you-can-change-the-url-on-any-indy-story-to-whatever-you-like-2269573.html
Update 4: 17 indexed now. And counting ...
Update 5: .The Head of Digital Audience & Content Development at this Indy has tweeted to blame the Guardian for the whole fiasco.

Jack Riley blames a Guardian sub
Maybe try the IT department too?
Update 6: By the end of the day, Google had indexed 62 different URLs for this story, nearly all via being made up and spread on twitter.
New ones included:
- AllAboutTheGames-is-the-best-gaming-site-on-planet-earth-2269573.html
- middleton-flicks-bean-as-she-waits-for-wedding-night-2269573.html
- what-first-attracted-you-to-royal-heir-prince-william-2269573.html
And a load of others I'm too tired to check.
Update 7: the next morning. Google has indexed 64 URLs (not all via Twitter. Reddit was having fun too ...).
It's no longer treating them all as duplicates.
Take a sentence from the story (which was not originally produced by the Independent) and add the word Independent and you are shown 5 versions of the story. Even without the word Independent, you see three versions on page one of the results and the option to see lots more.
The Indy's written a blog post apologising (for some reason).
We are however acting urgently (as are now some of our major competitors) to find a way to avoid such abuse and hope that will be in place shortly.
The solution's fairly simple. Do what other sites do with the same CMS and redirect to the canonical URL when someone types in gibberish in the part of the URL (the keywords) that isn't actually parsed.
You might also like
- Pippa Middleton’s arse: classy, Google, classy …
- Pippa Middleton underwear pictures: Google updates its autosuggester
- Independent newspaper allowing spammers to leave dofollow links
- Pippa Middleton’s arse: how newspapers optimise for the phrase without showing it to their readers
- Pippa Middleton’s arse closing the gap on her dress
I love that the original story has had a poxy 9 Retweets where as <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/utter-PR-fiction-but-people-love-this-shit-so-fuck-it-lets-just-print-it-2269573.html"this customised URL has had a whopping 607 Retweets and rising!
26
You can also swap out someone's name in a twitter URL but leave the message ID the same and the original message will come up.
Like so:
https://twitter.com/#!/PamHutch/status/60308668364767232
https://twitter.com/#!/_JackRiley/status/60308668364767232
A more amusing example perhaps is this one: https://twitter.com/#!/the-independent-is-being-made-to-look-rather-silly/status/60308668364767232
[...] not clear whether this is the work of a disgruntled hack or a media critic. The meme started spreading in British media circles before most American journalists woke up, but it's now in circulation over here, too. [...]
Darn. The editor just said they are acting "urgently" to fix this bug (they called it a "feature", actually) to end the abuse and tomfoolery. Shucks.
Strange URL stunts like this produce a great deal of duplication on news sites. I run a news clipping service that learns to ignore such excess arguments. It's just as bad across news networks, where multiple domains each introduce their own useless bits to the same URL.
Most blog applications (WordPress is a great example) allow users to inject odd strings that accomplish nothing. Major news outlets may use more sophisticated CMS but -- as the Independent demonstrates -- they still manage to create bizarre duplicates.
Some of what passes for "URL design" is ridiculous. It's valuable to "search for your own articles and URLs, and consider how they may appear to potential visitors.