<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Official Arsenal site doesn&#8217;t come first when you search for &#8216;Arsenal&#8217; in Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/official-arsenal-site-no-longer-ranks-first-for-arsenal-in-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/official-arsenal-site-no-longer-ranks-first-for-arsenal-in-google/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Depesh</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/official-arsenal-site-no-longer-ranks-first-for-arsenal-in-google/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Depesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=384#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>you&#039;ll probably find that Arsenal World are indeed producing better SEO - perhaps not of their own making, but with more &#039;natural&#039; links from other websites to theirs. For example, if you&#039;re an avid Gooner, you&#039;d probably get more out of the Arsenal World site (as I do) than the official website, as there is a really good active forum and the posts placed by the authors are controversial at times but usually always interesting. 

The official site has its uses, like breaking stories or  things like reserve game reviews but if you have a website of your own, you may well end up linking to Arsenal World site. Also, the Arsenal World site may have more fresher content than the official site so this helps the SEO rankings. Finally, they may just be paying more attention to SEO than the official site? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you'll probably find that Arsenal World are indeed producing better SEO - perhaps not of their own making, but with more 'natural' links from other websites to theirs. For example, if you're an avid Gooner, you'd probably get more out of the Arsenal World site (as I do) than the official website, as there is a really good active forum and the posts placed by the authors are controversial at times but usually always interesting. </p>
<p>The official site has its uses, like breaking stories or  things like reserve game reviews but if you have a website of your own, you may well end up linking to Arsenal World site. Also, the Arsenal World site may have more fresher content than the official site so this helps the SEO rankings. Finally, they may just be paying more attention to SEO than the official site? <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

