PCC rules on Jan Moir: a strange and troubling ruling.
As it's late, I shall limit myself to comparing the reported ruling with the original article ...
PCC: "While many complainants considered that there was an underlying tone of negativity towards Mr Gately and the complainant on account of the fact that they were gay, it was not possible to identify any direct uses of pejorative or prejudicial language in the article."
Jan Moir: "the ooze of a very different and more dangerous lifestyle has seeped out for all to see".
What lifestyle does she mean here?
Jan Moir: "Gay activists are always calling for tolerance and understanding about same-sex relationships, arguing that they are just the same as heterosexual marriages. Not everyone, they say, is like George Michael. Of course, in many cases this may be true."
How gracious - "may" be true "in many cases" that "not everyone" is like George Michael (whatever that means).
Jan Moir: "Another real sadness about Gately's death is that it strikes another blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships."
What's she saying, that all civil partnerships are doomed to end unhappily?
PCC: Moir's claim that Gately's death had not been "natural", while controversial and speculative, "could not be established as accurate or otherwise".
Couldn't we have just use the post mortem to decide this?
You might also like
- Jan Moir: Don’t forget to change your meta descriptions …
- Nofollow: How to link to someone or something you detest (I’m looking at you Jan Moir)
- Jan Moir: Mail readers reject her hateful bile (probably)
- Jan Moir: Twitter forces Mail to pull all adverts
- Sidestepping Google Sidewiki: changing URLs won’t help