<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Express newspaper creates an infinite number of URLs using rel = canonical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-28255</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 19:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-28255</guid>
		<description>hahahahaha  Malcom, while the shear volume of it trumps my client site issue, the fact that this is just ONE problem, is superseded by my client&#039;s multiple layers of different problems.  

SO I&#039;d say my client site wins from the &quot;shear pathetic stupidity of the developers&quot; perspective.  Not by much though.  Not by much at all... 

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahahaha  Malcom, while the shear volume of it trumps my client site issue, the fact that this is just ONE problem, is superseded by my client's multiple layers of different problems.  </p>
<p>SO I'd say my client site wins from the "shear pathetic stupidity of the developers" perspective.  Not by much though.  Not by much at all... </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Heseltine</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-22797</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 13:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-22797</guid>
		<description>...and they have the same issue as the Independent had / the Sun has re: only the article ID being the unique identifier.  Which is why they have 

http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO
&amp; 
http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO-to-the-new-voting-system

in the index...

Canonical tags can be great, but they have to be implemented right, and a little bit of testing doesn&#039;t go amiss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>...and they have the same issue as the Independent had / the Sun has re: only the article ID being the unique identifier.  Which is why they have </p>
<p><a href="http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO" rel="nofollow">http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO</a><br />
&amp;<br />
<a href="http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO-to-the-new-voting-system" rel="nofollow">http://www.express.co.uk/features/view/244786/AV-referendum-Why-we-must-vote-NO-to-the-new-voting-system</a></p>
<p>in the index...</p>
<p>Canonical tags can be great, but they have to be implemented right, and a little bit of testing doesn't go amiss</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-22793</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 13:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-22793</guid>
		<description>didn&#039;t understand a bloody word of that but it sounds freakin&#039; awful. glad you&#039;re on our side!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn't understand a bloody word of that but it sounds freakin' awful. glad you're on our side!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry White</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-22722</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 08:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-22722</guid>
		<description>I have seen this so often in sitemaps - where this same reason causes duplication and sitemaps created from crawling have this repetition in them...  I thought that Google would be better at fixing this and similar issues though! (even if I think that Google shouldn&#039;t have to)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have seen this so often in sitemaps - where this same reason causes duplication and sitemaps created from crawling have this repetition in them...  I thought that Google would be better at fixing this and similar issues though! (even if I think that Google shouldn't have to)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-22689</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 07:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-22689</guid>
		<description>Some testing might have been in order. Some newspapers suffer from CMSes that create multiple versions of URLs for different sections (ie with /section/ in the URL) etc - 301ing often isn&#039;t an option for their current implementations (as you&#039;ll lose section specific rules about layout, colour etc). Better CMSes are the ultimate solution of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some testing might have been in order. Some newspapers suffer from CMSes that create multiple versions of URLs for different sections (ie with /section/ in the URL) etc - 301ing often isn't an option for their current implementations (as you'll lose section specific rules about layout, colour etc). Better CMSes are the ultimate solution of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Young</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/rel-canonical-infinite-express/#comment-22688</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 07:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=6016#comment-22688</guid>
		<description>Amazing how an organisation such as the Express can get something like this so so wrong, but they aren&#039;t the first and they certainly wont be the last.

I for one, am not wholly against canonical tags, they do have a very useful function in certain specific instances, however I am increasingly seeing more widespread implementations of these around various campaigns and not always in implementations I would deem relevant and where other options such as 301&#039;s may be better alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing how an organisation such as the Express can get something like this so so wrong, but they aren't the first and they certainly wont be the last.</p>
<p>I for one, am not wholly against canonical tags, they do have a very useful function in certain specific instances, however I am increasingly seeing more widespread implementations of these around various campaigns and not always in implementations I would deem relevant and where other options such as 301's may be better alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
