<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO revenge: analytics style</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/seo-revenge-analytics-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/seo-revenge-analytics-style/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/seo-revenge-analytics-style/#comment-7932</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3979#comment-7932</guid>
		<description>Just out the sneaky %^$$#&amp;!, of course they don&#039;t have permission to do that, and if they have it&#039;s because they suckered/talked their clients into this.

Some business could lose quite a bit of money if their pages suddenly starts dropping in the rankings, at least if you out them someone will point it out so they can fix the problem.

Unless you condone the practice, there is absolutely no reason not to out them.

&quot;But I figured someone there should know that we&#039;re on to them ...&quot;

Big woop! - As if they even care, you already say you&#039;re not going to out them. 

At least inform their clients so they know what these scumbags did and then you&#039;re onto something Malcolm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out the sneaky %^$$#&amp;!, of course they don't have permission to do that, and if they have it's because they suckered/talked their clients into this.</p>
<p>Some business could lose quite a bit of money if their pages suddenly starts dropping in the rankings, at least if you out them someone will point it out so they can fix the problem.</p>
<p>Unless you condone the practice, there is absolutely no reason not to out them.</p>
<p>"But I figured someone there should know that we're on to them ..."</p>
<p>Big woop! - As if they even care, you already say you're not going to out them. </p>
<p>At least inform their clients so they know what these scumbags did and then you're onto something Malcolm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Vicary</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/seo-revenge-analytics-style/#comment-7769</link>
		<dc:creator>William Vicary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3979#comment-7769</guid>
		<description>Yes it is a form of cloaking, if you serve Google something different to what you serve everyone else then you will run into problems with a penalisation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is a form of cloaking, if you serve Google something different to what you serve everyone else then you will run into problems with a penalisation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Barton</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/seo-revenge-analytics-style/#comment-7692</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Barton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3979#comment-7692</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t that a form of &quot;cloaking,&quot; which is against Google&#039;s terms of service? That could be hurting their (friend of a friend) SEO, don&#039;t you think? I know if I came across that I&#039;d be furious. Just because you work on someone&#039;s site does not mean you can hide links in somebodies site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn't that a form of "cloaking," which is against Google's terms of service? That could be hurting their (friend of a friend) SEO, don't you think? I know if I came across that I'd be furious. Just because you work on someone's site does not mean you can hide links in somebodies site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
