September ABCes: How the Guardian and Telegraph overtook the Mail 1
June 2009 saw the Mail Online unexpectedly overtake both the Guardian and Telegraph in the ABCes, partly on the back of US traffic and Michael Jackson stories.
Fast forward to September and the story is the same as earlier in the year - Guardian 1st, Telegraph 2nd and Mail 3rd. So what changed from June to September? To find out, I've compared the ABCe figures for UK and foreign visitors in June and September. The difference between the Guardian's performance and that of the Telegraph and Mail is revealing.
Guardian: strong growth here and abroad
Table: September unique visitors (millions) and percentage change since June
| Total | Change | UK | Change | Overseas | Change | |
| Guardian | 33m | 14% | 11.9m | 17% | 21.1m | 12% |
Analysis
The Guardian has seen significant growth in the UK AND abroad.
Its total visitor numbers grew 14% from June to September (up from 29m to 33m). There was a 17% increase in UK visitors and a 12% increase in visitors from abroad. This makes it the most popular online newspaper in the UK by some way (it's 2.4m ahead of the Mail in second place).
UK visitors accounted for 36% of the total in September (barely changed from 35% in June).
Telegraph: overseas growth only
Table: September unique visitors, percentage change since June
| Total | Change | UK | Change | Overseas | Change | |
| Telegraph | 31m | 14% | 9.1m | -1% | 21.9m | 22% |
Analysis
The Telegraph has also seen a 14% increase in total visitors from June (27.2m) to September (31m).
However, the geographical breakdown is revealing - its UK unique visitor numbers are down 1% from June to August but its overseas visitors are up 22% (from 18m to 21.9m). It's now the most visited UK newspaper abroad - but only the 3rd most visited inside the UK.
As a result, the proportion of its visitors that comes from the UK has fallen from 34% to 29% - the lowest of any UK newspaper (the Mail held this honour back in June).
The Telegraph saw the biggest increase in overseas visitors of any newspaper - but because its UK traffic fell, the Guardian beat it into 2nd place.
Mail: UK growth only
Table: September unique visitors, percentage change since June
| Total | Change | UK | Change | Overseas | Change | |
| Daily Mail |
30m | 2% | 9.5m | 15% | 20.6m | -2% |
Analysis
The Mail's stood fairly still between June and September - it had 30m visitors last month, up just 2% on three months ago. But its story is the reverse of the Telegraph's.
The Mail saw strong UK growth - up 14% to 9.5m visitors in three months. Overseas visitors, however, fell by 2% to 20.6m. As a result, it now gets 32% of its visitors from the UK (up from 28% in June).
It got overtaken by the Guardian because it hasn't been able to match and sustain its overseas growth.
And the rest ...
As for the others:
- The Sun is down to 23m visitors in September, an 8% fall over 3 months. A 15% collapse in overseas visitors couldn't make up for a 3% increase in UK users.
- The Times is a story of decline - 13% down overall, with a 10% fall in the UK and a 14% fall from overseas.
- The same is true of the Mirror (down 5% overall) and the Independent (down 6% overall) but to a lesser extent.
This table has all the stats. If you can't see the iframe, you can see the full spreadsheet here.
The Express doesn't take part in the ABCes. The FT does only some months.
You might also like
- Michael Jackson's kids made the Daily Mail the most visited UK newspaper site in June
- Rate of growth slows for newspaper Twitter accounts
- National newspaper Twitter account growth gets ever slower ...
- UK newspaper twitter followers up 17% from August to September
- Growth of Newspaper Twitter accounts running out of steam

I wonder how much of the Times' failure to retain readers is down to their overly complicated webpage design, though? Their page layout seems complicated and confusing compared to that of the Guardian, which has a lot more white space and is far easier to read - also, it's easier to find related content from the Guardian's site, so people are more likely to stay within the site for longer.