<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do people REALLY not know the dangers of unfiltered twitter streams? &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-8823</link>
		<dc:creator>Do people REALLY not know the dangers of unfiltered twitter streams? &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-8823</guid>
		<description>[...] have thought people would realise the folly of unmoderated hashtag-based twitter streams by now (see Skittles etc). But not the Conservatives. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have thought people would realise the folly of unmoderated hashtag-based twitter streams by now (see Skittles etc). But not the Conservatives. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Charles Arthur Should Read Things Before Slagging Them Off : Jumping Through Hoops</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Charles Arthur Should Read Things Before Slagging Them Off : Jumping Through Hoops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>[...] That tweet was picked up by Private Eye and erroneously attributed to the Telegraph&#8217;s Assistant Editor, Justin Williams. If you want a full run-down of the argument between Shane and Charles, have a look at Malcom Coles&#8217; post That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That tweet was picked up by Private Eye and erroneously attributed to the Telegraph&#8217;s Assistant Editor, Justin Williams. If you want a full run-down of the argument between Shane and Charles, have a look at Malcom Coles&#8217; post That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardians&#8217; Rusbridger om å lage avis i det 21. århundre &#171; synset &#38; skrevet &#38; laget</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2479</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardians&#8217; Rusbridger om å lage avis i det 21. århundre &#171; synset &#38; skrevet &#38; laget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2479</guid>
		<description>[...] Om noen lurer på hvilken feide jeg viste til, da jeg stilte Rusbridger et &#8220;lame Twitter-question&#8221;, så er den beskrevet her. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Om noen lurer på hvilken feide jeg viste til, da jeg stilte Rusbridger et &#8220;lame Twitter-question&#8221;, så er den beskrevet her. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBC at high noon? Telegraph-Guardian spats &#124; DAILYMAIL.ME</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2266</link>
		<dc:creator>TBC at high noon? Telegraph-Guardian spats &#124; DAILYMAIL.ME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2266</guid>
		<description>[...] So, this week&#8217;s Twitterfall spat from Malcolm Coles: &#8216;That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, this week&#8217;s Twitterfall spat from Malcolm Coles: &#8216;That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shona Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>Shona Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 08:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>Agreed on the script - couldn&#039;t find an easy way of doing it myself. Didn&#039;t see the initial few tweets! Much as I enjoy sniping techies, it didn&#039;t seem the most helpful way of discussing the pros and cons of Twitterfail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed on the script - couldn't find an easy way of doing it myself. Didn't see the initial few tweets! Much as I enjoy sniping techies, it didn't seem the most helpful way of discussing the pros and cons of Twitterfail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2232</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 15:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2232</guid>
		<description>Ah, yes, the lie detector - such a pity we couldn&#039;t use the still from The Wire Series 5 Episode 1 where that appears. To fact-check the piece I had to hunt it down on YouTube. What a brilliant opener that is.

And the best thing is that they really, really did do that in real life in the Baltimore and Detroit homicide departments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, yes, the lie detector - such a pity we couldn't use the still from The Wire Series 5 Episode 1 where that appears. To fact-check the piece I had to hunt it down on YouTube. What a brilliant opener that is.</p>
<p>And the best thing is that they really, really did do that in real life in the Baltimore and Detroit homicide departments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>Script is brilliant - given up on desktop clients as a result.
And you&#039;re right about the others on Twitter - your exchange with Shaun had a certain self-contained quality, though. Plus I couldn&#039;t find a way to easily find and show everyone&#039;s related comments in a way that would be easy to follow. 
Next Guardian / Telegraph debate on Twitter needs its own hashtag ...
I enjoyed your &lt;a href=&#039;http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/23/computers-lie-detecting&#039;&gt;lie detector&lt;/a&gt; column to day by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Script is brilliant - given up on desktop clients as a result.<br />
And you're right about the others on Twitter - your exchange with Shaun had a certain self-contained quality, though. Plus I couldn't find a way to easily find and show everyone's related comments in a way that would be easy to follow.<br />
Next Guardian / Telegraph debate on Twitter needs its own hashtag ...<br />
I enjoyed your <a href='http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/apr/23/computers-lie-detecting'>lie detector</a> column to day by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think they&#039;re obliged to be (or were aiming to be).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't think they're obliged to be (or were aiming to be).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellie</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>If only they were witty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only they were witty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBC at high noon? Telegraph-Guardian spats &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/shane-richmond-charles-arthur-twackdown/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>TBC at high noon? Telegraph-Guardian spats &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=1070#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>[...] So, this week&#8217;s Twitterfall spat from Malcolm Coles: &#8216;That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8217;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, this week&#8217;s Twitterfall spat from Malcolm Coles: &#8216;That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full&#8217;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

