<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Behind the Times paywall: 46,154 readers a day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn&#039;t do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wildfire Tech PR Blog &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Should PR abandon the sinking (reader)ship?</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-15836</link>
		<dc:creator>Wildfire Tech PR Blog &#8211; Business and Consumer Technology Public Relations : Blog Archive : Should PR abandon the sinking (reader)ship?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 09:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-15836</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted by Max Tatton-Brown on Nov 02, 2010  TweetThe question went round recently as to whether or not PRs were still pitching The Times since it put up the paywall, considering rumoured subscription levels of as little as 40,000 readers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted by Max Tatton-Brown on Nov 02, 2010  TweetThe question went round recently as to whether or not PRs were still pitching The Times since it put up the paywall, considering rumoured subscription levels of as little as 40,000 readers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-12361</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-12361</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s another way of doing it...

http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/timesonline.co.uk#trafficstats

This would seem to indicate that they&#039;re at about 20% of pre-paywall levels, and perhaps at about 14% of the Guaridan&#039;s current level.  

250K then, roughly.

Presumably that number includes many who arrive, and then leave without paying... the interesting number is the total brought in by the paywall (minus the lost advertising revenue)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's another way of doing it...</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/timesonline.co.uk#trafficstats" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/timesonline.co.uk#trafficstats</a></p>
<p>This would seem to indicate that they're at about 20% of pre-paywall levels, and perhaps at about 14% of the Guaridan's current level.  </p>
<p>250K then, roughly.</p>
<p>Presumably that number includes many who arrive, and then leave without paying... the interesting number is the total brought in by the paywall (minus the lost advertising revenue)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-11579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-11579</guid>
		<description>George: The advertising is extremely limited on the new sites - If you compare it with all other media it only has one square slot per page, compared to at least three areas of advertising on other sites. It is also in a non -obtrusive format so you wont have ads appearing over editorial like so many other sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: The advertising is extremely limited on the new sites - If you compare it with all other media it only has one square slot per page, compared to at least three areas of advertising on other sites. It is also in a non -obtrusive format so you wont have ads appearing over editorial like so many other sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-11577</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-11577</guid>
		<description>George: The advertising is extremely limited on the new sites - If you compare it with all other media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George: The advertising is extremely limited on the new sites - If you compare it with all other media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No paying, no gain? &#171; Paperback Rioter</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-11180</link>
		<dc:creator>No paying, no gain? &#171; Paperback Rioter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-11180</guid>
		<description>[...] a lot of readers since forcing people to pay for its services. Indeed, traffic could be down by as much as 90%, possibly more, since introducing the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a lot of readers since forcing people to pay for its services. Indeed, traffic could be down by as much as 90%, possibly more, since introducing the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Een freemiummodel voor een kwaliteitspers &#124; geschreven om te lezen</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-11009</link>
		<dc:creator>Een freemiummodel voor een kwaliteitspers &#124; geschreven om te lezen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-11009</guid>
		<description>[...] geld is geen houdbare situatie. Alles achter slot en grendel werkt evenmin, zeker in België niet. The Times overleeft misschien op 46154 lezers op een markt van ettelijke tientallen miljoenen, qua schaalgrootte is dat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] geld is geen houdbare situatie. Alles achter slot en grendel werkt evenmin, zeker in België niet. The Times overleeft misschien op 46154 lezers op een markt van ettelijke tientallen miljoenen, qua schaalgrootte is dat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Peat</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-10961</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Peat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-10961</guid>
		<description>I think that the numbers will fluctuate and the real importance here is the business model that the times have chosen to adopt in these trying times. Promotion may work but there will certainly be some hard lessons to learn, and The Times will be the first mover in this market, with stiff competition from the BBC.

It is certainly a great subject for debate:

http://www.binarydesigner.co.uk/2010/07/do-we-agree-in-online-paywalls/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the numbers will fluctuate and the real importance here is the business model that the times have chosen to adopt in these trying times. Promotion may work but there will certainly be some hard lessons to learn, and The Times will be the first mover in this market, with stiff competition from the BBC.</p>
<p>It is certainly a great subject for debate:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.binarydesigner.co.uk/2010/07/do-we-agree-in-online-paywalls/" rel="nofollow">http://www.binarydesigner.co.uk/2010/07/do-we-agree-in-online-paywalls/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-10941</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-10941</guid>
		<description>I would pay the daily charge if their was no advertising but if they need to charge for online content and have adverts then the newspaper can&#039;t compete with quality titles like The Guardian and The Telegraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pay the daily charge if their was no advertising but if they need to charge for online content and have adverts then the newspaper can't compete with quality titles like The Guardian and The Telegraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-10877</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-10877</guid>
		<description>Interesting stuff. I&#039;ve just done the same test on today&#039;s headline story about the G20 protester Ian Tomlinson (22 July). It&#039;s 6pm and I don&#039;t know exactly how long each site has been running the story but the Guardian has 1055 comments while the Times has notched up a mighty 52.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting stuff. I've just done the same test on today's headline story about the G20 protester Ian Tomlinson (22 July). It's 6pm and I don't know exactly how long each site has been running the story but the Guardian has 1055 comments while the Times has notched up a mighty 52.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-paywall-readers/#comment-10867</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 10:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=4616#comment-10867</guid>
		<description>Oh, can you please quantify the *spectacularly*? Is it 1% or 1000? People always say big words but then... you know the rest :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, can you please quantify the *spectacularly*? Is it 1% or 1000? People always say big words but then... you know the rest <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
