<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter retweet: how the new RT functionality looks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/</link>
	<description>Where to find Malcolm Coles, reviews, and tips on how to do things I couldn't do.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caspar</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5973</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5973</guid>
		<description>I like the feature a lot.  But I wish they&#039;d been a bit more radical, and ignored the 140 limit.  Like your example shows, RTing more than 140 chars loses whatever is at the end - this is usually a URL.  Why not allow RTs to include the full 140 chars PLUS the &quot;RT @username&quot; at the start? Since the message you&#039;re sending itself is just 140 characters, I can&#039;t see anyone being up in arms about this.

Shame you can&#039;t add comments to the RT but sometimes it&#039;s nice to see a comment in the next post, where the person RTing can expand a bit more than just adding one or two words of agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the feature a lot.  But I wish they'd been a bit more radical, and ignored the 140 limit.  Like your example shows, RTing more than 140 chars loses whatever is at the end - this is usually a URL.  Why not allow RTs to include the full 140 chars PLUS the "RT @username" at the start? Since the message you're sending itself is just 140 characters, I can't see anyone being up in arms about this.</p>
<p>Shame you can't add comments to the RT but sometimes it's nice to see a comment in the next post, where the person RTing can expand a bit more than just adding one or two words of agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda Sherman</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5951</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5951</guid>
		<description>Malcolm, You provide a good reminder to keep tweets short enough to be retweeted. 

When I teach clients how to tweet I always show them the calculation of what their RT will take: 

RT @username: usually about 15 characters

I tell them to leave another minimum 10 characters for a comment and therefore they should stop their tweet when they see the counter at 25 not zero.
@LindaSherman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malcolm, You provide a good reminder to keep tweets short enough to be retweeted. </p>
<p>When I teach clients how to tweet I always show them the calculation of what their RT will take: </p>
<p>RT @username: usually about 15 characters</p>
<p>I tell them to leave another minimum 10 characters for a comment and therefore they should stop their tweet when they see the counter at 25 not zero.<br />
@LindaSherman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter trials new new-tweet feature &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5949</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter trials new new-tweet feature &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5949</guid>
		<description>[...] top of the new Twitter retweet feature, I also have the new web-based method for alerts about new tweets from people you follow. These [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] top of the new Twitter retweet feature, I also have the new web-based method for alerts about new tweets from people you follow. These [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5943</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 23:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5943</guid>
		<description>I like RT with comments too.  From what I gather, they had to make a choice here.  With the new RT functionality, all RTs from your friends of the same tweet collapse down into a single tweet in your timeline.  Collapsing is kinda hard to do if everybody can comment too.  Not impossible, but more difficult to show all the info in a clean fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like RT with comments too.  From what I gather, they had to make a choice here.  With the new RT functionality, all RTs from your friends of the same tweet collapse down into a single tweet in your timeline.  Collapsing is kinda hard to do if everybody can comment too.  Not impossible, but more difficult to show all the info in a clean fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RTer, ??????? @ Geedr.com</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>RTer, ??????? @ Geedr.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>[...] pic via Malcolm Coles&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pic via Malcolm Coles&#160; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david sanger</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5938</link>
		<dc:creator>david sanger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5938</guid>
		<description>Also if someone rwtweets you , you can delete the retweet, either from https://twitter.com/#retweeted_of_mine or from the retweeter&#039;s timeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also if someone rwtweets you , you can delete the retweet, either from <a href="https://twitter.com/#retweeted_of_mine" rel="nofollow">https://twitter.com/#retweeted_of_mine</a> or from the retweeter's timeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Isemann</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5935</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Isemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5935</guid>
		<description>Personally I think it just adds complexity. Didn&#039;t we love Twitter for being simple?

R!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think it just adds complexity. Didn't we love Twitter for being simple?</p>
<p>R!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5934</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5934</guid>
		<description>Interesting you should say that - I have been thinking of using the excerpt as a standfirst at the top of each post. Or using a new custom field ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting you should say that - I have been thinking of using the excerpt as a standfirst at the top of each post. Or using a new custom field ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaamit</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5933</link>
		<dc:creator>jaamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5933</guid>
		<description>interesting... perhaps they might develop their own tweetdeck style web app to get users on their own site? Personally i hate using the web interface but that might tempt me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interesting... perhaps they might develop their own tweetdeck style web app to get users on their own site? Personally i hate using the web interface but that might tempt me...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaamit</title>
		<link>http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/twitters-new-retweet/#comment-5932</link>
		<dc:creator>jaamit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/?p=3339#comment-5932</guid>
		<description>LOL you&#039;ve uncovered my dodgy skimreading style ;) Or, if I was gonna get all Malcolm-Colesy on you I could say how that exposes a usability fail in your blogging and how you should be writing key points in giant 24pt letters. No? OK, I&#039;ll just read things properly next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL you've uncovered my dodgy skimreading style <img src='http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Or, if I was gonna get all Malcolm-Colesy on you I could say how that exposes a usability fail in your blogging and how you should be writing key points in giant 24pt letters. No? OK, I'll just read things properly next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
